Accredited Public Health Department Characteristics Associated With Workforce Gaps Identified in Workforce Development Plans
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Published Date
Publisher
Journal of Public Health Management & Practice
Type
Abstract
Objective: When pursuing accreditation by the Public Health Accreditation Board, local health departments (LHDs) must submit a workforce development plan (WDP). The purpose of this study was to examine LHD characteristics associated with workforce gaps identified and strategies implemented by LHDs.
Design: We conducted a qualitative content analysis of all WDPs submitted to the Public Health Accreditation Board between March 2016 and November 2021.
Setting: We examined WDPs from all accredited LHDs (n = 183) at the time of data collection in January 2022. A majority of LHDs had more than 50 staff members (n = 106, 57.9%), had a decentralized governance structure (n = 164, 89.6%), had county-level jurisdictions (n = 99, 54.1%), and served rural populations (n = 146, 79.8%).
Main Outcome Measures: For each overarching theme, we constructed 2 binary variables indicating whether the LHD identified a workforce gap or strategy among any subthemes within each overarching theme. Logistic regressions were used to examine relationships between LHD characteristics and identification of a workforce gap or strategy for each theme.
Results: Few LHD characteristics were significantly associated with gaps identified or strategies implemented by LHDs. LHDs applying for reaccreditation had higher odds (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.44; confidence interval [CI], 1.04-5.83) of identifying a leadership gap and of identifying a recruitment gap (AOR, 2.94; CI, 1.11-7.52) compared to LHDs applying for accreditation for the first time. LHDs serving urban populations had higher odds (AOR, 2.83; CI, 1.32-6.25) of identifying a recruitment strategy compared to LHDs that only served suburban/rural populations.
Conclusions: Overall, many workforce gaps reported by LHDs were universally observed irrespective of LHD characteristics. While most LHDs identified strategies to address gaps, our findings also reveal workforce areas where LHDs reported gaps without an accompanying strategy, indicating areas where LHDs could use more technical assistance and support.
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
Funding information
This study used a dataset generated by the Consortium for Workforce Research in Public Health (CWORPH), jointly funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the Health Workforce Research Center Cooperative Agreement program under awards UR2HP47371 and U81HP47167. The content and conclusions are those of the authors and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by CDC, HRSA, HHS, or the US Government.
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
10.1097/PHH.0000000000002046
Previously Published Citation
Burns, Ashlyn PhD, MPH; Kampman, Haleigh MPH; Karnik, Harshada PhD, MPP; Leider, Jonathon P. PhD; Yeager, Valerie A. DrPH, MPhil. Accredited Public Health Department Characteristics Associated With Workforce Gaps Identified in Workforce Development Plans. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice 31(2):p 204-212, March/April 2025. | DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002046
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Burns, Ashlyn; Kampman, Haleigh; Karnik, Harshada; Leider, Jonathon P.; Yeager, Valerie A.. (2025). Accredited Public Health Department Characteristics Associated With Workforce Gaps Identified in Workforce Development Plans. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002046.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.