Feasibility of using an adjustable sit-stand workstation at work and its Impact on non- exercise activity in sedentary office workers: a pilot randomized crossover trial

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Feasibility of using an adjustable sit-stand workstation at work and its Impact on non- exercise activity in sedentary office workers: a pilot randomized crossover trial

Alternative title

Published Date

2012-07

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Background: Over the last century, physical activity has been systematically removed from our daily lives through automation, a trend that continues today, and this has led to Americans spending a majority of the waking hours in a sedentary state (very low energy expenditure state, such as sitting). This phenomenon is thought to have detrimental health effects such as excess weight gain, cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality. A new field has emerged that has started to focus on reducing inactive time during the waking hours by building in more light activity, known as non-exercise activity, throughout the day. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a non-exercise activity could be increased during workday by installing a sit-stand desk at work. Method: A randomized cross-over study was conducted in a Minneapolis office with 28 sedentary office workers who participated in a four week intervention period (used a sit-stand desk to replace 50% of sitting time at work with standing) and a control period (usual sitting work environment), in random order, with a two week wash-out period (usual sitting, no measurement) in between. The intervention involved the installation of sit-stand work desks at each worker’s desk and ergonomic instruction for its use (Ergotron, Inc., St. Paul, MN). Results: Sedentary, computer-based, office workers replaced about 50% of their sitting time with standing (p-value <.0001). This intervention significantly increased activity during work hours (p-value <.0001). It appears that the intervention resulted in about 35 minutes of sedentary time being replaced with non-sedentary time on a workday. Moreover, this intervention significantly decreased caloric intake (211 kilocalorie/day, p-value = 0.01), despite the fact that instruction was given to maintain the same life-style during both periods of the study. Furthermore, this intervention significantly increased relaxation, calmness, energy, overall sense of well-being and Background: Over the last century, physical activity has been systematically removed from our daily lives through automation, a trend that continues today, and this has led to Americans spending a majority of the waking hours in a sedentary state (very low energy expenditure state, such as sitting). This phenomenon is thought to have detrimental health effects such as excess weight gain, cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality. A new field has emerged that has started to focus on reducing inactive time during the waking hours by building in more light activity, known as non-exercise activity, throughout the day. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a non-exercise activity could be increased during workday by installing a sit-stand desk at work. Method: A randomized cross-over study was conducted in a Minneapolis office with 28 sedentary office workers who participated in a four week intervention period (used a sit-stand desk to replace 50% of sitting time at work with standing) and a control period (usual sitting work environment), in random order, with a two week wash-out period (usual sitting, no measurement) in between. The intervention involved the installation of sit-stand work desks at each worker’s desk and ergonomic instruction for its use (Ergotron, Inc., St. Paul, MN). Results: Sedentary, computer-based, office workers replaced about 50% of their sitting time with standing (p-value <.0001). This intervention significantly increased activity during work hours (p-value <.0001). It appears that the intervention resulted in about 35 minutes of sedentary time being replaced with non-sedentary time on a workday. Moreover, this intervention significantly decreased caloric intake (211 kilocalorie/day, p-value = 0.01), despite the fact that instruction was given to maintain the same life-style during both periods of the study. Furthermore, this intervention significantly increased relaxation, calmness, energy, overall sense of well-being and decreased fatigue. The intervention turned out to be highly popular with over 96% of the subjects enjoying the use of the sit-stand work station and 89% choosing to have a sit-stand desk permanently installed at their work at the end of the study with the goal of standing a large portion of their workday. Discussion: Overall, a sit-stand desk appears to be a promising tool to reduce sedentary time at work. Given the proportion of waking hours spent at work, sit-stand desks may mitigate the health burden associated with sedentary lifestyles.

Keywords

Description

University of Minnesota M.S. thesis. July 2012. Major: Health Services Research, policy and administration. Advisors: Francois Sainfort, Mark A. Pereira, PhD. 1 computer file (PDF); vii, 33 pages, appendix p. 31-33.

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Dutta, Nirjhar. (2012). Feasibility of using an adjustable sit-stand workstation at work and its Impact on non- exercise activity in sedentary office workers: a pilot randomized crossover trial. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/165459.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.