Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

The reliability of dichotomous judgments: Unequal numbers of judges per subject

Fleiss, Joseph L.
Cuzick, Jack
1979
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

v03n4p537.pdf (369.74 KB)

Persistent link to this item

https://hdl.handle.net/11299/99941
Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

The reliability of dichotomous judgments: Unequal numbers of judges per subject

Authors

Published Date

1979

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

Consider a reliability study in which different subjects are judged on a dichotomous trait by different sets of judges, possibly unequal in number. A kappa-like measure of reliability is proposed, its correspondence to an intraclass correlation coefficient is pointed out, and a test for its statistical significance is presented. A numerical example is given.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Applied Psychological Measurement, Volume 03, 1979

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Fleiss, Joseph L & Cuzick, Jack. (1979). The reliability of dichotomous judgments: Unequal numbers of judges per subject. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 537-542. doi:10.1177/014662167900300410

Other identifiers

doi:10.1177/014662167900300410

Suggested citation

Fleiss, Joseph L.; Cuzick, Jack. (1979). The reliability of dichotomous judgments: Unequal numbers of judges per subject. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/99941.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.