Survey research measurement issues in evaluating change: A laboratory investigation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Published Date

Publisher

Abstract

Efforts to operationalize the alpha/beta/gamma change typology have suffered from a notable limitation. Virtually all have been conducted in field settings, thereby limiting the degree of experimental control over outcome criteria. Recognizing this limitation, the present study employed a laboratory methodology to investigate two research questions related to scale recalibration (beta change) in temporal survey research. Application of this methodology permitted random respondent assignment, exact replication of stimuli, and systematic time interval variation for the pretest-posttest design. Furthermore, the use of these procedures permitted testing the use of the retrospective design in assessing organizational change. Implications of the findings for the measurement of change are discussed.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Armenakis, Achilles A, Buckley, M. Ronald & Bedeian, Arthur G. (1986). Survey research measurement issues in evaluating change: A laboratory investigation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 147-157. doi:10.1177/014662168601000204

Other identifiers

doi:10.1177/014662168601000204

Suggested citation

Armenakis, Achilles A.; Buckley, M. Ronald; Bedeian, Arthur G.. (1986). Survey research measurement issues in evaluating change: A laboratory investigation. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/102294.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.