Power and robustness in product-moment correlation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Power and robustness in product-moment correlation

Published Date

1987

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

The power of statistical tests based on four popular product-moment correlation coefficients was examined when relatively small samples (10 ≤ N ≤ 100) are drawn from bivariate populations of several different distributional shapes. Analytical procedures for determining theoretical power under conditions of bivariate normality are presented for the Pearson (r[subscript p]), Spearman (r[subscript s]), point-biserial (r[subscript pb]), and phi (r[subscript fp]) coefficients. A monte carlo study supported previous conclusions that t as a test of H[subscript 0]: ρ=0, with r[subscript p] estimating ρ, is robust over a wide range of non-normality; however, frequent use of r[subscript s] leads to greater power under identical distributional assumption violations. The proportion of power due to Type III errors was also specified both analytically and empirically, and revealed the relative invulnerability of most statistical tests to directional misinterpretation.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Fowler, Robert L. (1987). Power and robustness in product-moment correlation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 419-428. doi:10.1177/014662168701100407

Suggested citation

Fowler, Robert L.. (1987). Power and robustness in product-moment correlation. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/114844.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.