The ordering power of an objective test was defined
in terms of the probability that this test led to
the correct ranking of examinees. A comparison of
the relative ordering power of separate and
grouped-items true-false (T-F) tests indicated that
neither type of test was uniformly superior to the
other across all levels of knowledge of examinees.
Instead, separate-items T-F tests were found to be
superior in discriminating among examinees with
medium and high levels of knowledge, and
grouped-items T-F tests with two and three items
per cluster were found to be superior for discriminating
among examinees with low levels of
knowledge. These findings do not support blanket
recommendations such as Ebel’s (1978) that "test
constructors should avoid constructing items in
multiple-choice form which are essentially collections
of T-F statements" (p. 43) or that, in general,
"it is better to present such statements as independent
T-F items" (p. 43). Rather, they are
similar to Lord’s (1977) findings concerning the
relative efficiency of multiple-choice tests with different
numbers of options per question for
examinees of differing ability levels.
Hsu, Louis M. (1979). Ordering power of separate versus grouped true-false tests: Interaction of type of test with knowledge levels of examinees. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 529-536. doi:10.1177/014662167900300409
Hsu, Louis M..
Ordering power of separate versus grouped true-false tests: Interaction of type of test with knowledge levels of examinees.
Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy,
Content distributed via the University of Minnesota's Digital
Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use
restrictions applied by the depositor.