This article, the second of two, presents predictive
validity data for on-job performance for a set
of computerized Graphic and Interactive Processing
(GRIP) tests in conjunction with data for both experimental
paper-and-pencil and operational tests.
Validity coefficients for job element and global criteria
are reported for four different jobs. Experimental
variables substantially enhanced the predictive
accuracy of the operational battery for Sonar
Technicians. Most experimental tests with significant
validities were computer-administered. The
GRIP tests were more useful than paper-and-pencil
tests for identifying personnel skilled in Interpreting
Visual Displays, Adjusting Equipment, and
Working Under Distractions. They were useful supplements
to paper-and-pencil tests for identifying
skill in four additional job elements.
Cory, Charles H. (1977). Relative utility of computerized versus paper-and-pencil tests for predicting job performance. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 551-564. doi:10.1177/014662167700100411
Cory, Charles H..
Relative utility of computerized versus paper-and-pencil tests for predicting job performance.
Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy,
Content distributed via the University of Minnesota's Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor.