Skip to main content

University of Minnesota / Driven to DiscoverUniversity of Minnesota

Libraries

View Item 
Who is to be master: accounting for how the Supreme Court reads the American Constitution
LeDuc, André (University of Minnesota Law School, 2020)
Thumbnail
View/Download file
Persistent link to this item
https://hdl.handle.net/11299/217034
Services
Title
Who is to be master: accounting for how the Supreme Court reads the American Constitution
Authors
Issue Date
2020
Publisher
University of Minnesota Law School
Type
Article
Abstract
Book review: Fidelity and constraint: how the Supreme Court has read the American Constitution. By Lawrence Lessig. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019; reviewed by André LeDuc
Appears in collections
Constitutional Commentary, Volume 35, Number 2 (Summer 2020) [7]
Identifiers
issn: 0742-7115
Previously Published Citation
Constitutional Commentary, Volume 35, Number 2 (Summer 2020), page 241-299
Description
1 online resource (PDF, page 241-299)
Suggested Citation
LeDuc, André. (2020). Who is to be master: accounting for how the Supreme Court reads the American Constitution. University of Minnesota Law School. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/217034.
Content distributed via the University of Minnesota's Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor.