Browsing by Subject "Interview"
Now showing 1 - 20 of 27
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item AAP Interview: Adrienne Su(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Jane Trenka(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Jessica Hagedorn(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Ka Vang(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Karen An-hwei Lee(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Karen Tei Yamashita(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Kimiko Hahn(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: May Lee Yang(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Reconstruction of Voice: 30 Years Later(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Sherry Quan Lee(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Shin Yu Pai(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Souvankham Thammavongsa(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Sun Yung Shin(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Teena Apeles(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Victoria Chang(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem AAP Interview: Wah-Ming Chang(Voices from the Gaps, 2004) Worra, Bryan ThaoItem All We Have: Performance Photographs and Artist Interviews in the Contemporary(2016-06) Wolff, RachelThis dissertation examines two distinct but related sources used in the writing of history about the present and recent past: documentary photographs and artist interviews. Contemporary art history relies heavily on both tools as offering historical evidence. The two also share some attributes as sources: they are simultaneously of the moment and out of time, fragmentary while also appearing to be encompassing, definitive in their possibility of making meaning despite being highly mediated. While photographs and interviews act within a constellation of evidence, I argue that there is something particular about their use in contemporary art history. My goal is to interrogate what might be lost and gained in using photographs and interviews as historical evidence, and therefore what looking at or reading these tools responsibly might entail. To do so, I begin with introducing words and pictures in the contemporary most broadly, before providing literature reviews related to both interviews and photographs more specifically. I then examine these tools through the framework of what I call “networked witnessing,” proposing how we could and should use photographs and interviews within contemporary art history. With this framework established, I turn to my case studies—first performance photographs, then artist interviews—in order to offer examples of carrying out my recommendations. While my case studies explore the variety of conclusions one might productively draw from understanding historical evidence through networked witnessing, I ultimately reveal the ways in which photographs and interviews require a type of inter-viewing—of looking again, from various perspectives, through many layers of mediation, for what might be unfamiliar—that can change our perceptions of our own scholarly responsibility.Item Interview codings of attachment style:using profile analysis to understand the patterns involved.(2011-01) Swinburne Romine, Rebecca EstherAttachment style is frequently discussed in terms of profiles of early childhood risk factors. Those using attachment interview methods use their ratings of these risk factors in developing an attachment style rating. In spite of this, profile analysis has yet to be used to model specific attachment styles. By using a multiple regression profile analysis to model attachment style in terms of coder's ratings of early risk factors, we can test empirically whether individual elements are relevant and how. The study of attachments began with Freud in the middle of the last century. Since that time attachment style has been studied first by John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, and since that time by many others. Early views of attachment, including the identification of specific attachment styles, and the investigation of its stability are discussed, as well as the limitations of the existing research. Specifically, the paper addresses the need for additional research to support or refute the theoretical models of attachment structure. Many methods have been developed to assess attachment style, most of which are closely tied to one particular theoretical view of attachment structure. Because the data for this paper are drawn from a study which utilized a four-prototype model of attachment as assessed for a coded semi-structured interview, the best way to understand the resultant codes is through a profile analysis. By using a two-step multiple regression profile analysis procedure, we can assess the unique contributions of both the level of risk, and the pattern of risk factors. The multiple regression methodology has the additional benefit of allowing for both continuous predictors and criterion variables; something that is not possible with other profile analysis methodologies. This allowed me to run the regressions with both dichotomous and semi-continuous criterion variables which enable the detection of different patterns. The results indicate that both the profile patterns and level can predict the criteria. The pattern component however is significantly more predictive of the criteria. While the derived patterns differ from the predicted patterns, they remain consistent with theory. Overall, environmental risk factors such as abuse, neglect, and parental rejection were not predictive of attachment style or score, while individual risk factors such as anger at parents and rebellion, and the interactive factor of role reversal were highly predictive. This leads us to conclude that profiles are a viable method of understanding attachment styles, and that it is the individual's responses to the risk factors present in the childhood environment rather than those factors themselves which determine attachment style.Item Measuring Change: Evaluating Impact for Sustainable Programs(2015-04) Wilson, NatalieThis academic paper addresses the necessity and complexity of program evaluation, utilizing the comprehensive evaluation of the Illusion Theater’s “Keepin It Real” Program as a case study. I demonstrate how the “Keepin It Real” Program is pertinent to the conversation about the necessity of evaluation tools, and the results they can produce. The increase in demand for results-driven reporting has served as a catalyst to field-wide thinking about alternative ways to measure and report impact as a method for sustaining and improving programmatic activity.Item Review of Gloria E. Anzaldúa: Interviews / Entrevistas edited by AnaLouise Keating(Voices from the Gaps, 2005) Hubman, Melissa