Applied Psychological Measurement, Volume 10, 1986

Persistent link for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11299/100667

Browse

Browsing Applied Psychological Measurement, Volume 10, 1986 by Author "Hambleton, Ronald K."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Assessing the dimensionality of a set of test items
    (1986) Hambleton, Ronald K.; Rovinelli, Richard J.
    This study compared four methods of determining the dimensionality of a set of test items: linear factor analysis, nonlinear factor analysis, residual analysis, and a method developed by Bejar (1980). Five artificial test datasets (for 40 items and 1,500 examinees) were generated to be consistent with the three-parameter logistic model and the assumption of either a one- or a two-dimensional latent space. Two variables were manipulated: (1) the correlation between the traits (r = .10 or r = .60) and (2) the percent of test items measuring each trait (50% measuring each trait, or 75% measuring the first trait and 25% measuring the second trait). While linear factor analysis in all instances overestimated the number of underlying dimensions in the data, nonlinear factor analysis with linear and quadratic terms led to correct determination of the item dimensionality in the three datasets where it was used. Both the residual analysis method and Bejar’s method proved disappointing. These results suggest the need for extreme caution in using linear factor analysis, residual analysis, and Bejar’s method until more investigations of these methods can confirm their adequacy. Nonlinear factor analysis appears to be the most promising of the four methods, but more experience in applying the method seems necessary before wide-scale use can be recommended.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The changing conception of measurement: A commentary
    (1986) Hambleton, Ronald K.
    This paper comments on the contributions to this special issue on item banking. An historical framework for viewing the papers is provided by brief reviews of the literature in the areas of item response theory, item banking, and computerized testing. In general, the eight papers are viewed as contributing valuable technical knowledge for implementing testing programs with the aid of item banks.