This readme.txt file was generated on <2020-03-26> by ------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- 1. Title of Dataset Waste to Energy Prime Mover Efficiencies for Commercially Available Technology 2. Author Information Principal Investigator Contact Information Name: Aduramo Lasode Institution: University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Address: 111 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Email: lasod002@umn.edu ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3927-3829 Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: William Northrop Institution: University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Address: 111 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Email: wnorthro@umn.edu ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7189-2075 3. Date of data collection (single date, range, approximate date) 2019-07-01 through 2019-11-01 4. Geographic location of data collection (where was data collected?): Online collection in Minnesota 5. Information about funding sources that supported the collection of the data: MnDRIVE- Environment program at the University of Minnesota -------------------------- SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data: Access by request from primary author 2. Links to publications that cite or use the data: (accepted for conference presentation). Applicability of Energy Recovery Technologies for Wastewater Treatment 3. Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data: 4. Links/relationships to ancillary data sets: 5. Licenses/restrictions placed on the reposiotry thumbnail: Source: https://search.creativecommons.org/photos/53ec54fc-8aae-4bc6-acac-0735025951f1 Creator: Matilda Vaughan License: CC BY 4.0 Modifications: Artistic effects to present photograph in black and white, and the text “Prime Movers” 6. Was data derived from another source? Yes If yes, list source(s): 1. Ahmed, O. Y., & Northrop, W. F. (2018). Feasibility of Operating a Small Spark-Ignited Engine on Dilute Acetogenically-Generated Gases from Wastewater. In Spring Technical Meeting Central States Section of The Combustion Institute. Minneapolis, MN. 2. Aminov, Z., Nakagoshi, N., Xuan, T. D., Higashi, O., & Alikulov, K. (2016). Evaluation of the energy efficiency of combined cycle gas turbine. Case study of Tashkent thermal power plant, Uzbekistan. Applied Thermal Engineering, 103, 501–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.03.158 3. Asl, S. S., Tahouni, N., & Panjeshahi, M. H. (2016). Identification of Key Parameters for Benchmarking of Combined Cycle Power Plants Retrofit. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1125635 4. Athanasiou, C., Vakouftsi, E., Coutelieris, F. A., Marnellos, G., & Zabaniotou, A. (2009). Efficiencies of olive kernel gasification combined cycle with solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs). Chemical Engineering Journal, 149(1–3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.017 5. Bahadori, A., & Vuthaluru, H. B. (2010). Estimation of performance of steam turbines using a simple predictive tool. Applied Thermal Engineering, 30(13), 1832–1838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.04.017 6. Bakalis, D. P., & Stamatis, A. G. (2013). Incorporating available micro gas turbines and fuel cell: Matching considerations and performance evaluation. Applied Energy, 103, 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.026 7. Bang-Møller, C., Rokni, M., & Elmegaard, B. (2011). Exergy analysis and optimization of a biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine hybrid system. Energy, 36(8), 4740–4752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.005 8. Becker, W. L., Braun, R. J., Penev, M., & Melaina, M. (2012). Design and technoeconomic performance analysis of a 1 MW solid oxide fuel cell polygeneration system for combined production of heat, hydrogen, and power. Journal of Power Sources, 200, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.040 9. Braun, R. J., Klein, S. A., & Reindl, D. T. (2006). Evaluation of system configurations for solid oxide fuel cell-based micro-combined heat and power generators in residential applications. Journal of Power Sources, 158(2 SPEC. ISS.), 1290–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.064 10. Choudhury, A., Chandra, H., & Arora, A. (2013). Application of solid oxide fuel cell technology for power generation - A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 20, pp. 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.031 11. Colpan, C. O., Fung, A. S., & Hamdullahpur, F. (2012). Modeling of an integrated two-stage biomass gasifier and solid oxide fuel cell system. Biomass and Bioenergy, 42, 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.03.002 12. Fontell, E., Kivisaari, T., Christiansen, N., Hansen, J. B., & Pålsson, J. (2004). Conceptual study of a 250 kW planar SOFC system for CHP application. Journal of Power Sources, 131(1–2), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.025 13. Goldstein, L., Hedman, B., Knowles, D., Freedman, S. I., Woods, R., & Schweizer, T. (2003). Gas-Fired Distributed Energy Resource Technology Characterizations. Retrieved from http://www.osti.gov/bridge 14. Inui, Y., Yanagisawa, S., & Ishida, T. (2003). Proposal of high performance SOFC combined power generation system with carbon dioxide recovery. Energy Conversion and Management, 44(4), 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00069-9 15. Isa, N. M., Tan, C. W., & Yatim, A. H. M. (2018, January 1). A comprehensive review of cogeneration system in a microgrid: A perspective from architecture and operating system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 81, pp. 2236–2263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.034 16. Kannan, R., Tso, C. P., Osman, R., & Ho, H. K. (2004). LCA-LCCA of oil fired steam turbine power plant in Singapore. Energy Conversion and Management, 45(18–19), 3093–3107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2004.01.005 17. Kanoglu, M., & Dincer, I. (2009). Performance assessment of cogeneration plants. Energy Conversion and Management, 50(1), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.08.029 18. Kazempoor, P., Dorer, V., & Weber, A. (2011). Modelling and evaluation of building integrated SOFC systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(20), 13241–13249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.003 19. Kim, C. K., & Yoon, J. Y. (2016). Performance analysis of bladeless jet propulsion micro-steam turbine for micro-CHP (combined heat and power) systems utilizing low-grade heat sources. Energy, 101, 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.070 20. Kim, Y., Hong, S. A., Nam, S., Seo, S. H., Yoo, Y. S., & Lee, S. H. (2011). Development of 1 kW SOFC power package for dual-fuel operation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(16), 10247–10254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.10.056 21. Mazzucco, A., & Rokni, M. (2014). Thermo-economic analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell and steam injected gas turbine plant integrated with woodchips gasification. Energy, 76, 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.035 22. Newsom, G. (2019). A Comprehensive Assessment of Small Combined Heat and Power Technical and Market Potential in California California Energy Commission. Retrieved from www.icf.com 23. Poullikkas, A. (2005, October). An overview of current and future sustainable gas turbine technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 9, pp. 409–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2004.05.009 24. Powell, M., Meinhardt, K., Sprenkle, V., Chick, L., & McVay, G. (2012). Demonstration of a highly efficient solid oxide fuel cell power system using adiabatic steam reforming and anode gas recirculation. Journal of Power Sources, 205, 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.098 25. Rajesh, R., & Kishore, P. S. (2018). Thermal Efficiency of Combined Cycle Power Plant. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.31033/ijemr.8.3.30 26. Shrivastava, A., & Prabu, V. (2016). Thermodynamic analysis of solar energy integrated underground coal gasification in the context of cleaner fossil power generation. Energy Conversion and Management, 110, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.12.009 27. Song, T. W., Sohn, J. L., Kim, T. S., & Ro, S. T. (2006). Performance characteristics of a MW-class SOFC/GT hybrid system based on a commercially available gas turbine. Journal of Power Sources, 158(1), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.09.031 28. Tanim, T., Bayless, D. J., & Trembly, J. P. (2014). Modeling a 5 kWe planar solid oxide fuel cell based system operating on JP-8 fuel and a comparison with tubular cell based system for auxiliary and mobile power applications. Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 245, pp. 986–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.008 29. Trendewicz, A. A., & Braun, R. J. (2013). Techno-economic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell-based combined heat and power systems for biogas utilization at wastewater treatment facilities. Journal of Power Sources, 233, 380–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.017 30. Van Herle, J., Maréchal, F., Leuenberger, S., Membrez, Y., Bucheli, O., & Favrat, D. (2004). Process flow model of solid oxide fuel cell system supplied with sewage biogas. Journal of Power Sources, 131(1–2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.013 31. Zaporowski, B., & Szczerbowski, R. (2003). Energy analysis of technological systems of natural gas fired combined heat-and-power plants. Applied Energy, 75(1–2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-2619(03)00017-5 6. Recommended citation for the data: Aduramo Lasode, William Northrop.(2020).W aste To Energy Prime Mover Efficiencies. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota, https://doi.org/10.13020/31n4-hg68 --------------------- DATA & FILE OVERVIEW --------------------- 1. File List A. Filename: Waste To Energy Prime Mover Tech Efficiency Data DRUM Short description: The data here is compiled information on efficiency and electric power capacity of prime mover technologies commercially available. Information on five main technologies are provided- Steam Turbine, Gas Turbine, MicroTurbine, Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine and Fuel Cell (mostly Solid Oxide). B. Filename: Tidy Waste To Energy Prime Mover Tech Efficiency Data DRUM Short description: Tidy version of Waste To Energy Prime Mover Tech Efficiency Data DRUM 2. Relationship between files: Same data 3. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: Not applicable 4. Are there multiple versions of the dataset? No -------------------------- METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: Data was collected from publicly available documentation of commercial technologies(listed earlier in README) for the prime mover technologies in focus. 2. Methods for processing the data: The raw data is reported- efficiency and electric power output. These two are used to obtain the initially available chemical power to the prime mover system. 3. Instrument- or software-specific information needed to interpret the data: Not applicable 4. Standards and calibration information, if appropriate: Not applicable 5. Environmental/experimental conditions: Not applicable 6. Describe any quality-assurance procedures performed on the data: Data is presented as reported by publicly available sources. 7. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis and/or submission: The primary author- Aduramo Lasode. ----------------------------------------- DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: [Waste To Energy Prime Mover Tech Efficiency Data DRUM] ----------------------------------------- 1. Number of variables: 5 2. Number of cases/rows: 387 3. Missing data codes: kW kilowatts MW megawatts GE General Electric 4. Variable List A. Name: Technology Description: Name of prime mover technology Steam Turbine, Gas Turbine, MicroTurbine, Reciprocating Engine, Fuel Cell B. Name: Average Power Range Description: Typical electric power capacity of each technology in waste to energy applications C. Name: Electric Power Output Description: Electric power capacity rating for commercially available products in each technology category, provided in kW D. Name: Reported Efficiency Description: Data collected from various sources on efficiency of each product, reported in % E. Name: Chemical Power Input Description: Calculated information using the reported efficiency and electric power output of a product (electric power output*100/efficiency), provided in kW