This readme.txt file was generated on <20200814> by ------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- 1. Title of Dataset: Data to accompany Longitudinal Fruit and Vegetable Sales in Small Food Retailers: Response to a Novel Local Food Policy and Variation by Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status 2. Author Information Lead Author Contact Information Name: Megan R. Winkler Institution: University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health Address: 1300 S. 2nd Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454 Email: mwinkler@umn.edu Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Kathleen Lenk Institution: University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health Address: 1300 S. 2nd Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454 Email: lenk@umn.edu Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Darin J. Erickson Institution: University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health Address: 1300 S. 2nd Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454 Email: erick232@umn.edu Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Caitlin E. Caspi Institution: University of Minnesota, Medical School, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health Address: 717 Delaware Street SE, Rm 183, Minneapolis, MN 55414 Email: cecaspi@umn.edu Principal Investigator Contact Information Name: Melissa N. Laska Institution: University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health Address: 1300 S. 2nd Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454 Email: mnlaska@umn.edu 3. Date of data collection: 2014 - 2017 4. Geographic location of data collection : Minneapolis, MN, and St. Paul, MN, USA 5. Information about funding sources that supported the collection of the data: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK104348); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U48DP005022); National Center for Advancing Translational Science (UL1TR000114) -------------------------- SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/] 2. Links to publications that cite or use the data: Winkler MR, Lenk KM, Erickson DJ, Caspi CE, Laska MN. Longitudinal Fruit and Vegetable Sales in Small Food Retailers: Response to a Novel Local Food Policy and Variation by Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020 Jul 29; 17(15):5480. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155480 3. Recommended citation for the data: Winkler, Megan R; Lenk, Kathleen M; Erickson, Darin J; Caspi, Caitlin E; Laska, Melissa N. (2020). Data to accompany Longitudinal Fruit and Vegetable Sales in Small Food Retailers: Response to a Novel Local Food Policy and Variation by Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota, https://doi.org/10.13020/adr6-3542. --------------------- DATA & FILE OVERVIEW --------------------- 1. File List A. Filename: Store_winkler_drum_dataset.sas7bdat Short description: SAS data file containing the manager survey and customer intercept interview data (summarized to store level) reported in the associated publication. Note that store ID numbers are not always numerically sequential because a store may have been deemed ineligible or dropped out over time; likewise, some stores do not have data for all variables at all time points. *Additional file with the same name in .csv format for preservation and interoperability B. Filename: winkler_STORE_Variables in dataset_DRUM.pdf Short description: Word file that describes the variables included in the SAS data file. 2. Relationship between files: N/A 3. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: See Laska, Melissa N; Caspi, Caitlin E; Lenk, Kathleen; Moe, Stacey G; Pelletier, Jennifer E; Harnack, Lisa J; Erickson, Darin J. (2019). Data to accompany evaluation of the first U.S. staple foods ordinance: Impact on nutritional quality of food retailer offerings, customer purchases and home food environments. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota, https://doi.org/10.13020/qxtc-sc36. -------------------------- METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: The following summary was taken from the following paper: Winkler MR, Lenk KM, Erickson DJ, Caspi CE, Laska MN. Longitudinal Fruit and Vegetable Sales in Small Food Retailers: Response to a Novel Local Food Policy and Variation by Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020 Jul 29; 17(15):5480. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155480 Data for this analysis were part of the larger STORE (STaple foods ORdinance Evaluation) study. The primary objective of STORE was to assess the effects of the Minneapolis Staple Foods Ordinance, including overall changes in compliance, the healthfulness of the store environments, and customer purchasing in small food stores [9]. Data were collected in Minneapolis as well as in an adjacent city, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA, which served as the study’s comparison (i.e., control) site, across four time points— pre-ordinance revisions in Fall 2014 and three post-implementation time points, including Fall 2015 (ordinance revisions activated, no enforcement), Summer 2016 (early enforcement begins), and Fall 2017 (continued monitoring and enforcement). As previously described [9], stores were randomly selected based on administrative lists of licensed retailers. Stores were excluded from selection if they were supermarkets, authorized as a US Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) store, and/or a retailer exempt from the ordinance in Minneapolis, as well as comparable stores in St. Paul. Of the 180 stores (90 Minneapolis, 90 St. Paul) sampled, 23 stores were deemed ineligible after a pre-data collection store visit and two stores did not provide consent, resulting in 155 stores that consented and participated at one or more study time points. At each time point, teams of two data collectors visited stores primarily on weekdays between 10am and 7pm. Store owners or managers were asked to participate in an interviewer-administered manager survey, and customer intercepts were performed with manager permission to evaluate customer purchasing. We conducted intercept interviews with customers exiting stores and recorded observed food and beverage purchases (details on data collection methods, participant eligibility, and participant response rate have been published elsewhere) [9,26]. Interviewer-administered manager surveys were conducted in the store at a time convenient for the manager [27]. The sample for this analysis included stores that had a manager participate at one or more time points (n = 147 stores) and/or stores that had customers that were interviewed at one or more time points (n = 147 stores; n = 3039 customer interviews conducted across 2014–2017; See Supplemental Figure S1). Collectively, 137 stores had both manager and customer-level data. As previously reported [27], participating managers self- reported being predominantly male, non-Hispanic White, in their late thirties, and on average had managed and/or owned the store for approximately four years. Customers participating in intercept interviews self-reported being predominantly male, non- Hispanic White or non-Hispanic Black, approximately 40 years old, employed, and shopped at the store at least weekly [9]. 2. Methods for processing the data: Data collectors recorded data on hard copy (paper) forms while in the field. Hard copies were reviewed for clarity and detection/reconciliation of errors and were then manually data entered by a data entry service. 3. Describe any quality-assurance procedures performed on the data: Data collectors recorded data on hard copy (paper) forms while in the field. Hard copies were reviewed for clarity and detection/reconciliation of errors and were then manually data entered by a data entry service. Once data entry was complete, an extensive review of and quality control checks were administered on a random sample of the data. Any discrepancies, errors, or differences found were reconciled prior to inclusion in the final data set. 4. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis and/or submission: Stacey Moe (study coordinator) and Pamela Carr-Manthe (evaluation coordinator) directly oversaw data collection teams. Data were entered through a contract with Northwest Keypunch Inc. Bill Baker (data programmer) processed the entered data and led quality control checks with Ms. Moe and Ms. Carr-Manthe. Final analyses and analytic datasets were prepared by Kath Lenk (senior data analyst). All processes were overseen by Melissa Laska (study PI). ----------------------------------------- DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: [FILENAME] ----------------------------------------- See data dictionary file: winkler_STORE_Variables in dataset_DRUM.pdf