This readme.txt file was generated on <2020-09-15> by ------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- 1. Title of Dataset: Data from: Tests in a semi-natural environment suggest that bait and switch strategy could be used to control invasive Common Carp 2. Author Information Principal Investigator Contact Information Name: Peter J Hundt Institution: University of Minnesota Address: 2003 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA Email: hundt002@umn.edu ORCID:0000-0001-5567-3905 Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Jon Amberg Institution: U.S. Geological Survey Address: Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, WI, USA Email: jamberg@usgs.gov ORCID: 0000-0002-8351-4861 Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Blake Sauey Institution: U.S. Geological Survey Address: Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, WI, USA Email: bsauey@usgs.gov ORCID: 0000-0003-2819-0814 Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Kristen Vacura Institution: University of Minnesota Address: 2003 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA Email: vacur006@umn.edu ORCID: Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Przemyslaw G Bajer Institution: University of Minnesota Address: 2003 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA Email: bajer003@umn.edu ORCID: 0000-0002-7324-3359 3. Date of data collection (single date, range, approximate date): 2017-09-21 to 2017-10-13 4. Geographic location of data collection (where was data collected?): Pond experiment - U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center (UMESC) in La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA. Laboratory Experiment - University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA 5. Information about funding sources that supported the collection of the data: This project was funded by the Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) in association with the Minnesota Aquatic Invasive Species Research Center at the University of Minnesota. -------------------------- SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data: CC0 1.0 Universal 2. Links to publications that cite or use the data: https://www.reabic.net/journals/mbi/2020/3/MBI_2020_Hundt_etal.pdf 3. Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data: 4. Links/relationships to ancillary data sets: 5. Was data derived from another source? No If yes, list source(s): 6. Recommended citation for the data: Hundt, Peter J; Amberg, Jon; Sauey, Blake; Vacura, Kristen; Bajer, Przemyslaw G. (2020). Data from: Tests in a semi-natural environment suggest that bait and switch strategy could be used to control invasive Common Carp. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota, https://doi.org/10.13020/hzkr-n196. --------------------- DATA & FILE OVERVIEW --------------------- 1. File List A. Filename: PIT_tagged_FISH.csv Short description: Fish species, pond, total length (mm), unique PIT tag, date of mortality (? = fish carcass went missing (likely after death, blank = death date undetermined). B. Filename: Raw_detections.csv Short description: all fish detected during study - Month, Day, Hour, Min, PIT #(ast 6 digits only),Read (Oregon RFID measure - unused), Detection(Oregon RFID measure - unused) and Date (Day of experiment starting at 1). Erroneous dates, PIT numbers, and other characters are errors created by datalogger and were not included in analyses. C. Filename: R_code.pdf Short description: R code D. Filename: Summarized_mortalities.csv Short description:Contains summaries of the fish mortalities by pond and species before and after experimental treatment. The number of fish of each species that perished prior to TBT was estimated as: 40 (number initially stocked) minus fish that were recovered alive when the ponds were drained minus individuals that were recovered dead during TBT. Ponds with "*" were fed corn containing with ANT-A. 2. Relationship between files: Raw_detections.csv and PIT_tagged_FISH.csv can be combined and sorted to include all PIT detections and remove erroneous data. Detections can then be summarized. R code can be used with data taken from table in Summarized_mortalities.csv to determine results discussed in MS 3. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: Data from the Laboratory experiment is all contained within the text of the paper 4. Are there multiple versions of the dataset? no If yes, list versions: Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? -------------------------- METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: The pond experiment was conducted from September 21 to October 13, 2017, in six 0.1-ha earthen ponds located at UMESC in La Crosse, Wisconsin. The ponds had a relatively uniform depth of ~ 1 m, a soil overburden on the bottom, sparse aquatic vegetation, and water temperatures between 18.0 and 22.0 °C. Each pond was stocked with 40 Bluegills (92–173 mm Total Length (TL)), 40 Carp (229–510 mm TL), 40 White Suckers (Catostomus commersonii Lacepède, 1803; 176–315 mm TL), and 40 Yellow Perch (103–175 mm TL). Carp were collected wild from Albert Lea Lake (Minnesota); Yellow Perch were obtained from UMESC culture facilities; White Suckers were obtained from R.J. Hilger & Sons, Inc (Antigo, Wisconsin, USA); and Bluegill were obtained from Osage Catfisheries. Each fish was implanted with a unique 12 mm-HDX PIT tag (Oregon RFID, Portland, Oregon, USA). A 1-m diameter circular pass-over PIT tag antenna was placed flat on the bottom of each shallow end of each pond and secured to a metal stake to prevent movement. The antennas had a detection range of ~ 30 cm. Two multi-antenna HDX PIT readers (Oregon RFID) were used to record detection data; each reader gathered data from three ponds, 24 hrs/day. 2. Methods for processing the data: Raw detection data was gathered by Oregon RFID dataloggers. Each detections = recognition of unique fish at feeeding center, above detection antenna. 3. Instrument- or software-specific information needed to interpret the data: R v. 3.4.0 or greater 4. Standards and calibration information, if appropriate: 5. Environmental/experimental conditions: Semi-natural, uncovered outdoor pond 6. Describe any quality-assurance procedures performed on the data: 7. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis and/or submission: Peter J. Hundt Jon Amberg Blake Sauey Kristen Vacura - undergraduate techniicain with senior project: carp ability to detect Ant-A. Przemyslaw G. Bajer - PI Wenjun Lang - University of Minnesota stats consultant who authored the R code ----------------------------------------- DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: PIT_tagged_FISH.csv ----------------------------------------- 1. Number of variables: 5 2. Number of cases/rows: 976 3. Missing data codes: ? = fish carcass went missing (likely after death) blank = death date undetermined 4. Variable List A. Name: Species Description: species of fish (Common Carp, Yellow Perch, Bluegill, White Sucker) B. Name: POND # Description: unique pond that housed fish (1-6) C. Name: Total Length (mm) Description: Length from tip of snout to tip of tail D. Name: Tag # Description: unique identifier E. Name: Mortality Date Description: Date fish was found deceased or euthanized (if possible) ----------------------------------------- DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: Raw_detections.csv ----------------------------------------- 1. Number of variables: 9 2. Number of cases/rows: 324375 3. Missing data codes: NA 4. Variable List A. Name: Year Description: Year B. Name: Month Description: Month C. Name: Day Description: Day D. Name: Hour Description: Hour E. Name: Min Description: Minute F. Name: PIT Description: passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag #(last 6 digits only) G. Name: Read Description: Oregon RFID measure - unused H. Name: Detection Description: Oregon RFID measure - unused I. Name: date Description: Day of experiment starting at 1