------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- 1. Title of Dataset Floral resource diversity drives bee community diversity in prairie restorations along an agricultural landscape gradient 2. Author Information Principal Investigator Contact Information Name: Ian G. Lane Institution: University of Minnesota Email: lanex173@umn.edu Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Christina Herron-Sweet Institution: University of Minnesota Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Zachary M. Portman Institution: University of Minnesota Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Daniel P. Cariveau Institution: University of Minnesota 3. Date of data collection: 2017-05-01 to 2017-09-30 4. Geographic location of data collection: Minnesota, USA 5. Information about funding sources that supported the collection of the data: Sponsorship: Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (M.L. 2016, Chp. 186, Sec. 2, Subd. 03a) -------------------------- SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States 2. Links to publications that cite or use the data: Lane, I. G., Herron‐Sweet, C. R., Portman, Z. M., & Cariveau, D. P. (2020). Floral resource diversity drives bee community diversity in prairie restorations along an agricultural landscape gradient. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13694 3. Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data: none 4. Links/relationships to ancillary data sets: Forb richness was derived from a seperate forb specific dataset. 5. Was data derived from another source? If yes, list source(s): No 6. Recommended citation for the data: Lane, Ian G; Herron-Sweet, Christina R; Portman, Zachary M; Cariveau, Daniel P. (2020). Floral resource diversity drives bee community diversity in prairie restorations along an agricultural landscape gradient. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota, https://doi.org/10.13020/23ar-k510. --------------------- DATA & FILE OVERVIEW --------------------- 1. File List A. Filename: Lane et al - SitebyRound.csv Short description: Site information formatted so that each site by round combination is represented. Important for diversity analysis that relys on rounds B. Filename: Lane et al - Site.csv Short description: Similar to site by round, but is not repeated by round. Used for analysis on beta diversity C. Filename: Lane et al - SpeciesData.csv Short description: Dataframe containing all bee observations and information about the specific specimen. Used in all analysis D. Filename: Lane et al - Script.R Short description: R script that pulls in the site and species data and generates the analysis and graphs found in the manuscript in the software R 2. Relationship between files: SitebyRound and Site are both relational to SpeciesData by either the "site" column or "rd_site" column. Script.R utilizes SitebyRound.csv, Site.csv, and SpeciesData.csv to conduct analysis 3. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: 4. Are there multiple versions of the dataset? yes/no If yes, list versions: Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? -------------------------- METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: A full description of collection methods can be found in the manuscript 2. Methods for processing the data: Specimen data was entered from physical data sheets created during processing of specimens. Site data was collected from ArcMap shape files and partner records. Forb richness was generated from a seperate dataset not included. 3. Instrument- or software-specific information needed to interpret the data: R is needed to run script. 4. Standards and calibration information, if appropriate: N/A 5. Environmental/experimental conditions: N/A 6. Describe any quality-assurance procedures performed on the data: Data were checked agaisnt paper logs at multiple stages of data entry. 7. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis and/or submission: Authors and list of ackowledgements can be found in the manuscript ----------------------------------------- DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: Lane et al - Site ----------------------------------------- 1. Number of variables: 24 2. Number of cases/rows: 17 rows 3. Missing data codes: Code/symbol Definition Code/symbol Definition 4. Variable List Example. Name: Gender Description: Gender of respondent 1 = Male 2 = Female 3 = Other A. Name: site Description: Unique name of each site in the study Value labels if appropriate B. Name: uniqueID Description: Unique column ID C. Name: siteID Description: Site code given by managing organization if applicable Value labels if appropriate D. Name: pair Description: Represents which pair this site belonged to. Not relevent to this study Value labels if appropriate E. Name: state Description: State the site was located MN = Minnesota F. Name: Name: county Description: County the site is located in G. Name: region Description: loosely defined region of the state the site was located in north = Northern region of study southwest = southwestern region of study southeast = South eastern region of study H. Name: Name: ha Description: Size, in hectares, of the restoration I. Name: latitude Description: latitude of the center point of the site J. Name: longitude Description: longitude of the center point of the site K. Name: type Description: what type of prairie the site was restoration = restoration remnant = remnant L. Name: mat. Description: Short for maturity. Represents the amount of time, in years, between when the restoration was seeded and when sampling began. M. Name: natural_1500 Description: Value labels if appropriate N. Name: primary_ag_1500 Description: Proportion of agricultural area within 1500 meters of the sampling area. O. Name: primary_ag_2000 Description: Value labels if appropriate P. Name: forb_rich Description: Value labels if appropriate ----------------------------------------- DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: Lane et al - SitebyRound.csv ----------------------------------------- 1. Number of variables: 12 2. Number of cases/rows: 81 rows 3. Missing data codes: Code/symbol Definition Code/symbol Definition 4. Variable List Example. Name: Gender Description: Gender of respondent 1 = Male 2 = Female 3 = Other A. Name: rd_site Description: combination of site name and sampling round number to create a unique ID for each round/site sampling event B. Name: site Description: Name of each site in the study C. Name: round Description: which round the sampling occured during. Values are 1-5 and correspond to three week periods of sampling, with 1 being the earliest in the season and 5 being the latest D. Name: state Description: State the site was located MN = Minnesota E. Name: county Description: County the site is located in F. Name: ha Description: Size, in hectares, of the restoration G. Name: latitude Description: latitude of the center point of the site H. Name: longitude Description: longitude of the center point of the site Value labels if appropriate I. Name: mat. Description: Short for maturity. Represents the amount of time, in years, between when the restoration was seeded and when sampling began. J. natural_1500 Description: Proportion of natural area within 1500 meters of the sampling area. Value labels if appropriate K. primary_ag_1500 Description: Proportion of agricultural area within 1500 meters of the sampling area. L. forb_rich Description: Number of forb species recorded at a particular site during a particular sample round Value labels if appropriate ----------------------------------------- DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: Lane et al - SpeciesData.csv ----------------------------------------- 1. Number of variables: 38 2. Number of cases/rows: 6595 rows 3. Missing data codes: Code/symbol Definition Code/symbol Definition 4. Variable List Example. Name: Gender Description: Gender of respondent 1 = Male 2 = Female 3 = Other A. Name: site Description: Site the observation occured B. Name: specimenID Description: Unique ID for the specimen observed C. Name: og_specimenID Description: Original Unique ID for specimen D. Name: year Description: year specimen was observed E. Name: month Description: three letter abbreviation for the month the specimen was observed may=may jun=June jul=july aug=august sep=september F. Name: day Description: day specimen was observed G. Name: round Description: Sampling round the specimen was observed H. Name: AM_PM Description: the sampling session the specimen was observed AM = morning sampling session PM = afternoon sampling session I. Name: plant_genus Description: Genus of the plant the specimen was collected from Value labels if appropriat J. Name: plant_species Description: species of the plant the specimen was collected from K. Name: transect Description: Transect the specimen was collected from L. Name: collector Description: Last name and first intial of the person who collected the specimen Value labels if appropriate M. Name: method Description: sampling method the specimen was collected with N. Name: date_processed Description: the date which the specimen was processed in the lab O. Name: processed_by Description: person who processed the specimen P. Name: morpho Description: short description of the physical appearence of specimen Value labels if appropriate Q. Name: pollen_bee Description: Indicator of if this specimen was collected in a mannor that allowed pollen analysis R. Name: digital_check_by Description: name of person who checked the digital entry for accuracy. S. Name: checked_on Description: when the specimen was checked for accuracy T. Name: collection_notes Description: long form notes on issues with the specimen U. Name: basicID Description: A descriptor meant for helping filter specimens. All specimens should be "nativebee" V. Name: ab_only Description: Indicator of if this specimen should be used only in measurements of abundance and not richness due to uncertainty in specimen ID yes = only use this specimen for abundance estimates no = This specimen can be used for all analysis W. Name: genus Description: Value labels if appropriate F. Name: enter_date Description: person who entered data on the specimens identification G. Name: correct_ID_and_spp Description: descriptive column meant to hold notes on ID issues with the specimen H. Name: questionableID Description: descriptive column meant to hold notes on ID issues with the specimen I. Name: specimen_location Description: The collection in which the specimen is housed J. Name: identification_notes Description: Notes from the identifier on interesting features of the specimen K. Name: rd_site Description: unique combination of site and rd for the purposes of binding site information L. Name: bee Description: Combination of genus and species to create a unique species name