<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2009-11-24T18:50:04Z</responseDate><request metadataPrefix="oai_dc" until="2008-04-30" verb="ListRecords" from="2008-04-15">http://conservancy.umn.edu/oai/request</request><ListRecords>
<record><header><identifier>oai:conservancy.umn.edu:5923</identifier><datestamp>2008-04-21T20:19:19Z</datestamp><setSpec>hdl_241</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:creator>Munnich, Lee Jr</dc:creator><dc:creator>More, Alec</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-21T20:19:18Z</dc:date><dc:date>2008-04-21T20:19:18Z</dc:date><dc:date>2008-02</dc:date><dc:identifier>http://purl.umn.edu/5923</dc:identifier><dc:description>This first in a series of Center for Excellence in Rural Safety (CERS) research summaries examines the current state of safety planning through interviews and a comprehensive review of the newly mandated strategic highway safety plans (SHSPs) and supporting documents from six states representing different U.S. regions: Alabama, Idaho, Maryland, Minnesota, Vermont, and Washington. The researchers took several steps to develop a knowledge base of existing conditions pertaining to safety planning in the six states. 

During the analysis, five key themes emerged: 1. A focus on changing driver behavior; 2. The importance of state-level public policy and political leadership; 3. The use of emerging technologies; 4. The importance of sustained, collaborative approaches; and 5. The use of measurement-driven approaches, which rely on enhanced data collection and new interpretive methodologies. 

In addition to these findings, case studies of each state provide a synopsis of certain aspects of their SHSPs. Recommendations concerning the SHSP development process and emphasis areas include: strengthening public engagement activities and initiatives to communicate the importance of roadway safety, reviewing the development structure and safety stakeholders involved, and continuing integration across agencies contributing to safety.</dc:description><dc:description>Federal Highway Administration</dc:description><dc:language>en_US</dc:language><dc:publisher>University of Minnesota Center for Excellence in Rural Safety</dc:publisher><dc:relation>Improving Rural Transportation Safety Report No. 1</dc:relation><dc:relation>CTS 08-02</dc:relation><dc:subject>Drivers</dc:subject><dc:subject>Highway safety</dc:subject><dc:subject>Public health</dc:subject><dc:subject>Rural transportation</dc:subject><dc:subject>Strategic Highway Safety Plan</dc:subject><dc:subject>Traffic safety</dc:subject><dc:subject>Transportation policy</dc:subject><dc:subject>Transportation planning</dc:subject><dc:title>Rural Transportation Safety and the Strategic Highway Safety Plan: An Examination of Select State Programs and Practices</dc:title><dc:type>Report</dc:type></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record>
</ListRecords></OAI-PMH>