|
University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy >
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities >
Applied Psychological Measurement >
Volume 01, 1977 >
Please use this permanent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://purl.umn.edu/98619
|
| Title: | Relative utility of computerized versus paper-and-pencil tests for predicting job performance |
| Authors: | Cory, Charles H. |
| Issue Date: | 1977 |
| Citation: | Cory, Charles H. (1977). Relative utility of computerized versus paper-and-pencil tests for predicting job performance. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 551-564. doi:10.1177/014662167700100411 |
| Abstract: | This article, the second of two, presents predictive
validity data for on-job performance for a set
of computerized Graphic and Interactive Processing
(GRIP) tests in conjunction with data for both experimental
paper-and-pencil and operational tests.
Validity coefficients for job element and global criteria
are reported for four different jobs. Experimental
variables substantially enhanced the predictive
accuracy of the operational battery for Sonar
Technicians. Most experimental tests with significant
validities were computer-administered. The
GRIP tests were more useful than paper-and-pencil
tests for identifying personnel skilled in Interpreting
Visual Displays, Adjusting Equipment, and
Working Under Distractions. They were useful supplements
to paper-and-pencil tests for identifying
skill in four additional job elements. |
| Permanent URL: | http://purl.umn.edu/98619 |
| Appears in Collections: | Volume 01, 1977
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format |
|---|
| v01n4p551.pdf | | 952Kb | PDF | View/Open |
|
Items in the Digital Conservancy are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|
