DSpace DSpace

University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy >
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities >
University Archives >
President's Emerging Leaders Program >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11299/91777

Title: Toward Implementation of Administrative Metrics
Other Titles: Administrative Metrics: Bringing the Best Ideas Forward
Authors: Beyer, Jessica
Gillard, Steve
Howe, Andy
VanSteenbergen, Julie
Issue Date: 30-Jun-2008
Publisher: University of Minnesota
Abstract: The Best Practice Management Tools Task Force/Administrative Service and Productivity Steering Committee was charged by the U of M president in 2005 to identify key outcome-based measurements by which the University could assess administrative functions' performance and benchmark their activities. This system is intended to be in direct alignment with and supportive of the University's overall metrics and strategic management systems. These metrics are specifically intended to measure the performance of common administrative/operational activities that occur at a variety of organizational levels throughout the institution in order to allow for information-based decision making about the University's administrative functions. These metrics are positioned in the context of other measures such as: the University's top-level metrics, Academic Units' Compact Scorecard metrics, unique unit metrics, and strategic initiative measures. This has been an evolving body of work that is now being driven by the University Administrative Team as a part of Transforming the U. The University Administrative Team has refined and endorsed an administrative metrics system that primarily utilizes a “scorecard approach” that will be cascaded into the organization. An underlying premise of this system is that administrative operations should be assessed holistically to get at the idea that operations are marbled throughout the institution (i.e., central administrative units and colleges). Metric categories and suggested measures have been defined for each quadrant of the scorecard. Discussions have begun about data sources for the suggested measures and the scorecards are currently being piloted in three management systems – IT, HR, and Space/Facilities. Administrative leaders are counting on this system to be a critical information source for assessing the performance of their respective disciplines throughout the Institution.
Description: 2 online resources (PDF files): Final report and Poster presentation
URI: http://purl.umn.edu/91777
Appears in Collections:President's Emerging Leaders Program

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
ohr_asset_097546.pdfFinal Report2.35 MBPDFView/Open
ohr_asset_098007.pdfPoster172.01 kBPDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.