DSpace DSpace

University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy >
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities >
Dissertations and Theses >
Dissertations >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11299/45475

Title: Curriculum Policy, Controversy, and Change: Minnesota's Profile of Learning, 1993-2003
Authors: DeLapp, Peggy Reed
Keywords: Curriculum policy
Evaluation
Historical case study
Politics of education
Standards
Educational Policy and Administration
Issue Date: Oct-2008
Abstract: This historical case study of Minnesota’s Profile of Learning examines how and why the policy was created, implemented, and finally repealed. The Profile of Learning, Minnesota’s first attempt at a statewide standards-based curriculum policy, was developed beginning in 1993, officially adopted in 1998, and repealed in 2003. Intended to stimulate change through statewide high expectations for students and associated improvements in curriculum and instruction, it instead became controversial and contested. The study uses a conceptual framework that addresses the social and political context for the policy, the policy actors and their beliefs about the purpose of schooling and the knowledge that should be contained in the curriculum, and the policy levers of curriculum, instruction, and teacher learning. Through the use of primary and secondary source documents and interviews, a chronology of significant events in the life of the Profile was constructed. The story was then examined to determine probable causes for the policy’s failure. These included shifts in the state and national political contexts, varied policy stances on the part of policy actors and stakeholders, interest group activity from a group strongly opposed to the policy, conflicting beliefs about purpose and knowledge, and the use of ineffective policy levers. The case study suggests the need for improved attention to the policymaking process, particularly at the transition points between the policy ideas and formulation and subsequently between policy formulation and implementation. The lack of clear policy goals, appropriate policy instruments, and attention to feasibility contributed to later difficulties with the policy, as did the failure to use evaluative information to make adjustments during the implementation process. In addition, stronger collaboration between policymakers and practitioners is needed for the development of effective curriculum policy.
Description: University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. October 2008. Major: Educational Policy and Administration. Advisor: Nicola A. Alexander. 1 computer file (PDF); v, 331 pages.
URI: http://purl.umn.edu/45475
Appears in Collections:Dissertations

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
DeLapp_umn_0130E_10021.pdf1.31 MBPDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.