DSpace DSpace

University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy >
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities >
Applied Psychological Measurement >
Volume 18, 1994 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11299/120012

Title: Why Factor Analysis Often is the Incorrect Model for Analyzing Bipolar Concepts, and What Model to Use Instead
Authors: Van Schuur, Wijbrandt H.
Kiers, Henk A.
Issue Date: 1994
Abstract: Factor analysis of data that conform to the unfolding model often results in an extra factor. This artificial extra factor is particularly important when data that conform to a bipolar unidimensional unfolding scale are factor analyzed. One bipolar dimension is expected, but two factors are found and often are interpreted as two unrelated dimensions. Although this extra factor phenomenon was pointed out in the early 1960s, it still is not widely recognized. The extra factor phenomenon in the unidimensional case is reviewed here. A numerical illustration is provided, and a number of diagnostics that can be used to determine whether data conform to the unidimensional unfolding model better than to the factor model are discussed. These diagnostics then are applied to an empirical example. Index terms: factor analysis, factor interpretation problems, rating scales, unfolding diagnostics, unfolding model.
URI: http://purl.umn.edu/120012
Appears in Collections:Volume 18, 1994

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
v18n2p097.pdf1.96 MBPDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.